to me it doesn't even sound like a quality control issue, it sounds like an outright design flaw. Perhaps instilling a DFSS process would work best for them. This way it would cut down on failures.
This can also be solved retroactively by using the theory of why.
Why did the part break? Because the material was too thin.
Why was the material too thin? It was designed this way.
Why was it designed this way? To save costs.
Why did the accountant tell the engineer to save on costs? Because marketing positioned the product to fit within an unrealistic price bucket.
Tada.
This can also be solved retroactively by using the theory of why.
Why did the part break? Because the material was too thin.
Why was the material too thin? It was designed this way.
Why was it designed this way? To save costs.
Why did the accountant tell the engineer to save on costs? Because marketing positioned the product to fit within an unrealistic price bucket.
Tada.
Last edited: