New Track Best

[Sactown]

first time at the track with the 3.4 pulley (saleen SC) and new tune. Last run was my best.

Only got in 5 runs but here is the break down.
Run 1
Reaction: .298 (sucks!)
I1 1.940
l2 5.454
l3 8.264
l3 (mph) 89.308
l4 10.626
E.T. 12.606
MPH 114.269
(hit the rev limiter in every gear)

Run 2
Reaction: .316
I1 1.774
l2 5.039
l3 7.715
l3 (mph) 93.059
l4 10.012
E.T. 11.952
MPH 117.203

Run 3
Reaction: .075
I1 1.928
l2 5.124
l3 7.873
l3 (mph) 93.277
l4 10.175
E.T. 12.114
MPH 116.454
Hit rev limiter in 3rd

Run 4
Reaction: .104
I1 1.941
l2 5.233
l3 7.903
l3 (mph) 93.150
l4 10.195
E.T. 12.127
MPH 117.159

Run 5
Reaction: -.034 (red lighted)
I1 1.851
l2 5.084
l3 7.730
l3 (mph) 93.556
l4 10.011
E.T. 11.933
MPH 117.468

 

[stkjock]

what tires are u using? manual/auto?

frankly those numbers seem a bit high for 460 whp

 

[Sactown]

what tires are u using? manual/auto?

frankly those numbers seem a bit high for 460 whp

MT ET Streets, manual. My differential also bit the dust last night, I was only getting 1 tire to spin during burnout.

Which numbers? ET or MPH?

 

[stkjock]

well both, but ET a bit more than trap speed.


I ran 11.89 @ 117.5 (da @ -1450) in my vert on 265/40/18 MT ET SR IIs pulling 1.73 60' on what I suspect was crappy plugs (recently changed and car pick up 25hp) so maybe I was makeing 420-425hp. I also gotta believe the car has 200-250lbs more than yours (3950-3975 race wt).

yours still stock 3.55s?

 

[Sactown]

well both, but ET a bit more than trap speed.


I ran 11.89 @ 117.5 (da @ -1450) in my vert on 265/40/18 MT ET SR IIs pulling 1.73 60' on what I suspect was crappy plugs (recently changed and car pick up 25hp) so maybe I was makeing 420-425hp. I also gotta believe the car has 200-250lbs more than yours (3950-3975 race wt).

yours still stock 3.55s?

gears are 4.10's. The 60ft on my time of 11.93 was a 1.85, so yes my ET is at least a couple of .10's higher than it should be, but that was my first time at the track with the new power, plus my differential is shot.

 

[stkjock]

well upgrade your diff and get your azz back out there!!

IMO you should be able to pull 1.6-1.7 60's and run mid 11s at worst

 

[Sactown]

well upgrade your diff and get your azz back out there!!

IMO you should be able to pull 1.6-1.7 60's and run mid 11s at worst

That's what I was thinking 1.6-1.7 60's and mid 11's.

 

[stkjock]

BTW - Congrats on the new best

 

[Sactown]

BTW - Congrats on the new best

Thanks!

 

[ChevyKiller]

I agree with Stock - was the tree a 4/10 pro tree?

 

[Sactown]

I agree with Stock - was the tree a 4/10 pro tree?

No its not a pro tree.

 

[ChevyKiller]

I thought the sportsman tree showed RT's .500 and up? (.500 being perfect)

 

[Sactown]

I thought the sportsman tree showed RT's .500 and up? (.500 being perfect)

hmmm. not here, cut .008's before, but it is diffinetly not a pro tree.

 

[don_w]

I thought the sportsman tree showed RT's .500 and up? (.500 being perfect)

It depends on how old the track's timing system software is. NHRA switched over to a 0.000 tree a few years ago, but older systems are still being used at various tracks. The old systems (like at Irwindale and Qualcomm) have a 0.500 perfect light. Newer ones (like at Barona and Fontana) have a 0.000 perfect RT.

 

[Steedman07]

Nice job..Thats my goal this spring..11's or bust..

 

[Sactown]

Nice job..Thats my goal this spring..11's or bust..

Thanks! It was a little hard than I thought getting into the 11's. Traction is a HUGE issue.

 

[don_w]

Thanks! It was a little hard than I thought getting into the 11's. Traction is a HUGE issue.

So many people underestimate the "T" word...

Oh, and congrats! Time to change your sig!