Headers Install

Laga

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Posts
991
Reaction score
518
Location
Chicago
Yesterday I sprayed all of the upper bolts with free-all and didn't do anything else. Today after I got home from work I jacked the car up and sprayed all of the lower bolts. I then said fuck it and pulled the starter while I was under there and then removed all of the upper bolts. I'll be removing the rest tomorrow after work. If something comes up I'll ask you guys for advice. I made up my mind and I want to do this in my own garage.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________


I appreciate the input, for your situation I completely understand your frustration. I'm slightly worried about both things you listed. I've wanted these headers since I got the car and I came across too good of a deal to pass up. I was actually considering switching back to the stock manifolds until this came up.

From the research I've done, these GREEN cats will pass emissions and in Ohio you have two options for E-check. #1 go to the testing facility and drive it in to get inspected on the scanner and visually. #2 is the self serve kiosk for after hours, all you have to do is scan it yourself and if it passes it'll print out a passed E-check sheet and you're good to go... talk about a loophole lol. I'll be doing the kiosk but I did pass visual inspection twice because I just tell them that's how I bought it and they give it a pass.

And as for not gaining much power from the headers I feel as if that could be the case for a 5.0 because its DOHC 4V and well engineered but on the 3V (not saying its poor engineering, just a dated design) I've seen dyno comparisons that show pretty significant gain for being N/A. Regardless I'm too far in to pull out now, we'll see what happens.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Thank you for these pointers. I would guess that the main weight of the car being supported by the jack stands would allow the motor to be jacked up off of the oil pan without crushing it if the motor mounts were disconnected, still sketches me out though.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________


In that case I'll be ordering all of the factory hardware for sure. The headers came with metal gaskets, do you think those are ok to use or would my best bet be to go factory? The last thing I want to do is have to pull the headers off again just to put gaskets on. I have one more question regarding the header gaskets, I should've took a picture while I was in there but I noticed what looked like orange rtv squeezing out of the sides of the manifold gaskets... it was also on the threads of the manifold hardware. I'm guessing that this is Permatex high temp gasket maker, is this really necessary to prevent leaks?

View attachment 84907
Just use the metal Kooks gaskets, they work great by themselves. And yes you can lift under the front edge of oil pan. I used a folded up towel on top of a short 2x6 for padding using a floor jack to raise engine. I’ve past 3 emissions tests in IL with the standard cats. We pass as long as there are no CELs and the monitors are all ready.
 

pass1over

I like it LOW
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Posts
1,511
Reaction score
236
Location
Trenton, FL
he would have to wait un
" Most " people that did LT's on jack stands said they'd never do it again.
The fact that you have access to a lift makes it a non question..

He would have to wait until winter to use the lift though, since his car is put up for winter. It was either wait for lift and stare at pretty headers leaning up against the wall, or give it a go on jack stands. Seems like he couldn't wait, lol. I don't blame him, that mod itch is a tough one to scratch.
 

JC SSP

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Posts
1,033
Reaction score
434
Location
FL
On my 05' GT the original BBK gaskets blew out about 2 years after install. I replaced them with Kooks aluminum header gaskets #PY-8023A-AL

I do spray them with hi-temp copper seal (old racers trick) prior to install. Also, initially check the bolts after a few hundred miles just to make sure... So far no issues, 3 years and counting.
 

Pentalab

forum member
Joined
Mar 5, 2013
Posts
5,211
Reaction score
1,093
So, my 2c.
I was telling myself, don't bother with LT's, but I went ahead and put LT's on the coyote. It was a headache of a job, and all my fears (both of em) were realized.
Exhaust leaks, header bolts coming lose, check, just as I thought.
No gain in power as seen in my HPDE laptimes. Time & money wasted, but experience gained.
Seriously considering putting the stock shorties back on now. This will be decided after Watkins Glen in 2023.

Also, the fit was not what I expected and the car is stupid loud with any heavy right foot. Do cops really need to see and HEAR you? lolol

As far as I know, any LT header out there is not emission certified, and should fail the visual inspection automatically. (it's good to be exempt lol)

I don't track my 2010 GT auto, (4.6L,3v) with small M90 roush blower, it's just a street car. However, once the JBA ceramic coated LT's + mating hi-flow cats were added (catted H), the difference was night and day.(1 5/8 primary, 2.5" collector) Any idiot could tell the difference in the improved tq + hp. I had previously installed the bigger twin 62mm FRPP TB, and also a 94 tune before the LT install. Before the LT install, it was 350rwhp + 325 rwtq. After the LT install, it's now 386 rwhp and 376rwtq...with the same 5 psi boost. That's a bunch. I could have installed the smaller blower pulley, and gotten similar results...with 7-8 psi boost. It was a high level experiment. The advantage of the LT's is, they work in NA or blower mode. The smaller pulley only works in blower mode.

I think some of the gains are from the ceramic coating on both the inside and outsides of the LT's. The internal exhaust gases are hotter..and flow faster. Eng bay is definitely cooler, like 40 F cooler. Part of that is due to the ceramic coating...and part of it is that the new hi-flow cats reside below the front seats. Oem cats were at base of eng bay..and run hot. On a 2010, 80% of the upper grille is blocked off. Replaced oem upper grille with a 7 bar grille (upper foglamp delete). That vastly improved the airflow through the upper grille..and also provides addition eng bay cooling. It also eliminated the 2 x 90 deg bends into the 'snorkel' that feeds air into the oem airbox. (K+N panel filter also installed). Air is now straight in to the now exposed snorkel intake.

However, the exhaust was too damned loud..+ bad drone at 1900 rpm. (FRPP SS FRS-500 mufflers installed long before the LT's). I'm told the hi-flow cats are the culprit, not the LT's. So in went the SS Pypes M80's , (welded) just before the rear axle...... problem solved.
 
Last edited:

Juice

forum member
Joined
Aug 24, 2017
Posts
4,622
Reaction score
1,904
I don't track my 2010 GT auto, (4.6L,3v) with small M90 roush blower, it's just a street car. However, once the JBA ceramic coated LT's + mating hi-flow cats were added (catted H), the difference was night and day.(1 5/8 primary, 2.5" collector) Any idiot could tell the difference in the improved tq + hp. I had previously installed the bigger twin 62mm FRPP TB, and also a 94 tune before the LT install. Before the LT install, it was 350rwhp + 325 rwtq. After the LT install, it's now 386 rwhp and 376rwtq...with the same 5 psi boost. That's a bunch. I could have installed the smaller blower pulley, and gotten similar results...with 7-8 psi boost. It was a high level experiment. The advantage of the LT's is, they work in NA or blower mode. The smaller pulley only works in blower mode.

I think some of the gains are from the ceramic coating on both the inside and outsides of the LT's. The internal exhaust gases are hotter..and flow faster. Eng bay is definitely cooler, like 40 F cooler. Part of that is due to the ceramic coating...and part of it is that the new hi-flow cats reside below the front seats. Oem cats were at base of eng bay..and run hot. On a 2010, 80% of the upper grille is blocked off. Replaced oem upper grille with a 7 bar grille (upper foglamp delete). That vastly improved the airflow through the upper grille..and also provides addition eng bay cooling. It also eliminated the 2 x 90 deg bends into the 'snorkel' that feeds air into the oem airbox. (K+N panel filter also installed). Air is now straight in to the now exposed snorkel intake.

However, the exhaust was too damned loud..+ bad drone at 1900 rpm. (FRPP SS FRS-500 mufflers installed long before the LT's). I'm told the hi-flow cats are the culprit, not the LT's. So in went the SS Pypes M80's , (welded) just before the rear axle...... problem solved.

Guess I forgot the third dissapointment.
Cannot tell any difference with my ceramic JBAs as far as reduced underhood temps.
I should put mine on the dyno before I pull the LTs off and put the reliable and maintainance free stock shorties back on.
 

Tony Conti

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Posts
114
Reaction score
20
Location
Akron, OH
That depends on the type of exhaust gaskets being used........some also just use it as a precaution to ensure that no exhaust leaks occur because these are so much of a PITA to R&R............. Some use a copper-infused spray sealer to do the same task as the Permatex.....

Why most recommend using the OEM multi-layered metal exhaust gaskets if at all possible, but some header companies do provide good gaskets w\ their products.....but not all.

In the end your decision.....IMHO it doesn't hurt to use it if you want to.

Hope this helps.

PS edit--I read the rest of your last posting & saw where you already know the scoop concerning the emissions visual inspection side in your area so you should be fine. Just a tip to share......make damn sure that your car's EVAP system is up to snuff (mostly check the CPV to ensure it is fully sealing off when it is in closed position so engine won't be pulling in excess unmetered air\fuel vapors......this is the #1 reason for catalyst P0420\P0430 insufficiency DTC's outside of the cats outright failing themselves & will mess w\ these Kooks cats due to their smaller overall size thus less total substrate treating area to deal w\ any extra air entry that the PCM cannot control.

I think I'm going to end up using the kooks gaskets with the copper spray, if they leak then I'll go OEM. As far as no vacuum leaks go I might be ok but I'm not sure. I'm running the jlt series 3 and I noticed when I took the intake off on Tuesday that the 90° fitting on the bottom of the intake that goes to the passenger valve cover was not snug but not spinning loose either. If I tighten it snug it points the wrong way and the hose pulls it back making it sort of loose again. I could see this being a problem once everything is together since its behind the MAF. It's shitty that they have a plastic fitting threading into a plastic piece... we'll see. If its an issue I could have my friend plastic weld the fitting in the correct direction so I can save some cash. And yes a real plastic "welder" not jb weld lol
 
Last edited:

Midlife Crises

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2019
Posts
1,836
Reaction score
1,253
I ran Kooks headers with the soft aluminum Kooks gaskets and Hi-temp silicon on both sides of the gasket for ten years. Took them off for maintenance once and reinstalled them the same way. They have never leaked around the gaskets. Also using steel header bolts about an inch long and have never had problems with them coming loose.
 

MasterofDisaster

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2019
Posts
832
Reaction score
1,275
Location
Michigan
Good advice above. I installed BBK shorties on my 08 GT. I have only to items of advice.
  • A Scotchbrite pad on an oscillating tool did a great job of cleaning up the gasket surface of the heads. I was surprised that I had enough room, but it was there.
  • A ratcheting tie down strap worked well for holding the pipes off the ground so I could bolt them to the collectors.
 

Tony Conti

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Posts
114
Reaction score
20
Location
Akron, OH
Ok passenger side is completely done and was pretty easy. I’m stuck on the driver side… all top bolts are in easy and so are the front two. But the second to last bolt towards the firewall looks literally impossible to get on… my friend came over and it took both of us to get the bolt lined up and threads started but now I don’t know how the fuck I’m going to get this bolt tightened down at all. Any advice? I can’t figure out a way to get at it. Any advice from someone whose installed kooks LTH would be very appreciated. I’m getting really pissed lol
 

Tony Conti

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Posts
114
Reaction score
20
Location
Akron, OH
Ok passenger side is completely done and was pretty easy. I’m stuck on the driver side… all top bolts are in easy and so are the front two. But the second to last bolt towards the firewall looks literally impossible to get on… my friend came over and it took both of us to get the bolt lined up and threads started but now I don’t know how the fuck I’m going to get this bolt tightened down at all. Any advice? I can’t figure out a way to get at it. Any advice from someone whose installed kooks LTH would be very appreciated. I’m getting really pissed lol

Ok my buddy ended up getting it by almost laying on top of the radiator but it’s done. I owe him some beer for that one lol. The driver side is a two person job if you’re like me and have short ass arms.

Just need to button everything back up and it should be good to go for the spring.
 

ghunt81

New parts on old junk!
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Posts
1,074
Reaction score
160
Location
Clarksburg, WV
" Most " people that did LT's on jack stands said they'd never do it again.
The fact that you have access to a lift makes it a non question..

I've done it three times so what does that say about me :Big Laugh:

The initial install is the most difficult. After that pulling the headers out and putting them back in is easy. Pull the starter, support the engine and pull the motor mounts, disconnect the steering shaft, pull the dipstick, remove headers. I think JBA's have a little more room around the bolts than Kooks do but I'm not sure.

I initially did my ceramic coated JBA's, pulled them back out once for paint, then pulled them back out again when I found a smokin' deal on 304 stainless JBA's (also did that partly because my ceramic JBA's were welded up weird and the collectors didn't line up right). Those ones aren't coming back out.

I would have given some tips but I'm late to this party! Glad you got it done.
 

Tony Conti

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Posts
114
Reaction score
20
Location
Akron, OH
Car runs a lot better for sure, no misfiring but I did get a P0133 and P0153. Bank 1 sensor 1 and 2 slow response, I’m assuming that I reversed the upstream and downstream sensors because the NTK ones I got were specifically for a certain position but my dumbass forgot to write it down. Before I switch those sensors around and waste $30 in gas from driving, is there anything else that could be going on?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

07 Boss

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Posts
3,831
Reaction score
968
Location
Sin City
Car runs a lot better for sure, no misfiring but I did get a P0133 and P0153. Bank 1 sensor 1 and 2 slow response, I’m assuming that I reversed the upstream and downstream sensors because the NTK ones I got were specifically for a certain position but my dumbass forgot to write it down. Before I switch those sensors around and waste $30 in gas from driving, is there anything else that could be going on?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


That is a common problem when moving the sensors from the stock manifolds to headers becasue you're moving the sensors farther from the engine. The sensors rely upon the hot exhaust to get the sensors up to their proper operating temp. When you move them farther downstream it takes longer for them to get hot enough so the computer thinks something is wrong. Did you do any tuning for the headers. I believe it is somthing like O2 sensor transport delay time needs to be increased in the tune. Not positive though, It's been a while since I've had to deal with that.
 

Tony Conti

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Posts
114
Reaction score
20
Location
Akron, OH
I was planning on taking it to my tuner to have a new dyno tune out on it because I went from the bbk long tubes with shitty high flow cats to the kooks mid length header with “green” cats. I pulled out about 3 feet of o2 extension wires and only have a 6” extension on the passenger side so I figured I’d be ok to drive it with the previous tune for a little.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

07 Boss

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Posts
3,831
Reaction score
968
Location
Sin City
I was planning on taking it to my tuner to have a new dyno tune out on it because I went from the bbk long tubes with shitty high flow cats to the kooks mid length header with “green” cats. I pulled out about 3 feet of o2 extension wires and only have a 6” extension on the passenger side so I figured I’d be ok to drive it with the previous tune for a little.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Oh, your fine to drive it the way it is. Just a minor annoyance.

Wait, your sensors moved closer to the motor and now you have codes? That seems weird.
 

Tony Conti

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Posts
114
Reaction score
20
Location
Akron, OH
Oh, your fine to drive it the way it is. Just a minor annoyance.

Wait, your sensors moved closer to the motor and now you have codes? That seems weird.

Yeah that’s why I was like what the fuck cause the I got all brand new o2 sensors and all of them but one are stock length with no extensions. So I’m hoping I just accidentally reversed the upstream and downstream locations. If I’m still getting the code I’ll get it tuned sooner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Juice

forum member
Joined
Aug 24, 2017
Posts
4,622
Reaction score
1,904
I never got codes installing LTs on the coyote. But I can confirm that LTs do infact slow the response time of the O2s.
Forscan Mode 6 displays the time in ms for the coyote.
It was reporting ~140 ms.
Added 25% to the transport delay. I now am at 80ms.
I never looked at this on the stock headers, no clue what stock response time should be. Additional 5% had no effect, Im calling it 'dialed in'. lol
 

GlassTop09

Senior Member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Posts
1,141
Reaction score
525
Location
Farmington, NM
Car runs a lot better for sure, no misfiring but I did get a P0133 and P0153. Bank 1 sensor 1 and 2 slow response, I’m assuming that I reversed the upstream and downstream sensors because the NTK ones I got were specifically for a certain position but my dumbass forgot to write it down. Before I switch those sensors around and waste $30 in gas from driving, is there anything else that could be going on?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since you posted you used the NTK 22060\22500 NB O2 sensors (which are front\rear specific), you can look at the sensor leads to ID 1 from the other externally. The NTK 22060 sensors (pre-cat or front) have a shorter lead that doesn't have any stud mounting clips attached to them. The NTK 22500 sensors (post-cat or rear) have the longer leads w\ 2 stud mounting clips attached to them.
Internally, here's a picture of a NTK 22060\NTK 22500 NB O2 sensor's element shield placed end to end:
IMG_0084.JPGThe larger element shield (lower) is the NTK 22060 front\pre-cat NB O2 sensor.....................

If I read your postings correctly, you swapped out a set of BBK full-length LTH's for a set of Kooks mid-length LTH's, yes? If this is so, then IMHO, I don't think the tune's current O2 sensor transport delay map settings is the main culprit triggering the P0133\P0153 DTC's since the physical O2 sensor mounting position distance from the exhaust ports are closer......but this also will depend on how far the TD map settings were changed from OEM to accommodate the BBK LTH's.

What I'm typing below is related to a SO PCM (which you have) & the tune within it:

A P0133\P0153 O2 Sensor Slow to Respond DTC (B1S1\B2S1) is mainly due to the O2 sensor V\ms transition rate between 600mV (rich line) to 300mV (lean line) or vice-versa being out of bounds (below the slow threshold) from when the PCM calls for a fueling switch from either rich or lean to when the O2 sensor voltage actually responds to this change in fueling around stoichiometry (usually within 100 ms time frame). If these sensors did get swapped, I can definitely see these DTC's coming up due to knowing the NTK 22500's (rear or post-cat) weren't designed for engine fueling control thus are slower responding compared to the NTK 22060's........that is, if they got swapped around.

The O2 Sensor Transport Delay map settings are a measurement in time (seconds) from when the PCM commands a fuel injector to start injecting fuel into a cylinder to when the PCM applies a fueling correction from the O2 sensor reaction to the exhaust from said cylinder, based on the engine RPM's at the time. The PCM will adjust these settings to correct this timing within a set window in the tune so as long as the actual timing falls within this correction window, the PCM can remove this out of the equation......except whenever the engine load drops below .20 load (below this threshold O2 TD timing correction\learning is disabled) thus if this is causing an issue w\ O2 sensor response time it will be mostly during engine idle (low RPM threshold is also set @ 1,000 RPM's, below this O2 TD timing correction\learning is disabled)......which IMHO is very doubtful since the physical O2 sensor mounting distance is closer to exhaust ports in the Kooks LTH's than the BBK LTH's (which would actually physically speed up the idle & overall O2 TD timing signals instead of slowing them down). Most tuners do not touch any of these in-tune TD control settings......only the actual timing settings in the TD map.

The Kooks LTH's will almost run off the OEM O2 TD map settings w\o issue (the only area where they can get into trouble is during idle when the TD learning\correction is disabled) & the only other in-tune setting that can directly affect O2 sensor TD timing is the injector reference CA timing setting (sets injector EOIT to camshaft adv dur IVO timing point....thus sets when an injector will be commanded open.....this setting will also change based on any commanded cam retard timing).

Since you haven't had the tune touched during this LTH swap out, I highly doubt your issue is tune related & you're already on the right track to start off TS'ing...........

My 2 cents................hope this helps.
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top