FRPP 3V vs BOSS intake

101fng

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Posts
304
Reaction score
0
images

why, umad? we can be mad together if you want.
 

Germeezy3

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Posts
3,998
Reaction score
26
LSX is a great platform

Better keep it 4V>LSX>2V>3V

I am thinking 4V = LSX because even though the greatest 4V is 200 hp up on the LSx there are more fast LSx motors over all the LSx family than there are fast 4V's and I mean 8 second and faster. Also N/A to N/A the LSX > 4V.
 

SlowA$$5.0

Banned
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Posts
681
Reaction score
1
Location
USA
I am thinking 4V = LSX because even though the greatest 4V is 200 hp up on the LSx there are more fast LSx motors over all the LSx family than there are fast 4V's and I mean 8 second and faster. Also N/A to N/A the LSX > 4V.

N/A they are faster because they have a huge cube advantage. Still doesn't change the fact that the fastest 4V is faster than the fastest LSX. I'll agree that they are equal for us mortals, but the people with unlimited money go faster with a 4V.

holy shit let this stupid ass thread die already.

yumad?
 

bullittrevor

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Posts
1,117
Reaction score
1
Location
Texas
N/A they are faster because they have a huge cube advantage. Still doesn't change the fact that the fastest 4V is faster than the fastest LSX. I'll agree that they are equal for us mortals, but the people with unlimited money go faster with a 4V.



yumad?
Mad? No. I don't get mad over things on the interwebs. Annoyed? Kinda. Annoyed that lots of threads have ended up like this one lately.
 

Germeezy3

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Posts
3,998
Reaction score
26
N/A they are faster because they have a huge cube advantage. Still doesn't change the fact that the fastest 4V is faster than the fastest LSX. I'll agree that they are equal for us mortals, but the people with unlimited money go faster with a 4V.



yumad?

One guy at this point, runs faster than the fastest 4V's by equally as wide of a margin almost as the nearest LSx. I think its arguable because the fastest N/A LSx crushes the fastest N/A 4V. Also Mihovetz will never share with anyone how he builds his engine, so money won't buy you a motor running as hard as his 4V.

So yes the fastest between the two outright is the 4V, but there are more 8 second or quicker LSx's than there are 4V's. But still both of those pale in comparison to the BBC or BBF.
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Posts
197
Reaction score
1
Location
Rock Island, IL
So yes the fastest between the two outright is the 4V, but there are more 8 second or quicker LSx's than there are 4V's. But still both of those pale in comparison to the BBC or BBF.

give it a few years and compare agian. But i'll honestly be suprised if we see 130+ trap speeds from an NA 4V like some of the LS7's are capable of.
 

SlowA$$5.0

Banned
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Posts
681
Reaction score
1
Location
USA
One guy at this point, runs faster than the fastest 4V's by equally as wide of a margin almost as the nearest LSx. I think its arguable because the fastest N/A LSx crushes the fastest N/A 4V. Also Mihovetz will never share with anyone how he builds his engine, so money won't buy you a motor running as hard as his 4V.

So yes the fastest between the two outright is the 4V, but there are more 8 second or quicker LSx's than there are 4V's. But still both of those pale in comparison to the BBC or BBF.

I like the LSX, but of course it is stronger N/A. Hell, you can get 440 cubes out of those things lol. Poor little 4.6's, 5.0's, and 5.4's can't compete with that without a power adder.

give it a few years and compare agian. But i'll honestly be suprised if we see 130+ trap speeds from an NA 4V like some of the LS7's are capable of.

I could care less about a LS7. You can build a much better LSX for way less money.
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top