FRPP 3V vs BOSS intake

Vxer1000

Camaro Can Kicker
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Posts
589
Reaction score
11
Location
Waukegan, Illinois
Cool, I have one of those sitting in my living room. However, it runs 9's with a 25 shot, stock length s/a, and dot track tires.

It has been said before, maybe you should lrn2dryv

Be careful about busting on my racing skills because I haven't had anyone here match me in a stock 2010 Mustang. I also rarely lost to other stock bikes on that one.

What year model? Mine was a 2002. Also, did you run straps? How about a pipe or gears? Mine was stock height and length with no straps or pipes or gears. Completely stock as showroom. A 25 shot is a 17% bump in HP for my bike so that is pretty significant if you have a 140HP to the rear wheel. To the car guys, it might sound like much, but 25HP on a bike is like having a 75HP shot in my 3V. Nice try.

lolwat?

You bragged about being fast running 13's in a mustang and mid 10's on a 1000. As a smart man once said, you proved yourself slow.

You couldn't match my times in the same vehicle. Care to prove it someday?

You can't even match a 2v's times.

Sorry 3v owners, this guy is further proving that your platform is terrible.

Since you failed to address specific points and/or provide proof or accept my challenge, I will have to assume you are a troll and not here to provide any meaningful input.
 

SlowA$$5.0

Banned
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Posts
681
Reaction score
1
Location
USA
Since you failed to address specific points and/or provide proof or accept my challenge, I will have to assume you are a troll and not here to provide any meaningful input.


Your challenge was dumb, but if it makes you feel better.

Sure, you can drive to me and I will gladly drive your car down the track to see how it runs with me driving it. This weekend good?:stfu:
 

Germeezy3

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Posts
3,998
Reaction score
26
3V>2V, why are you having trouble grasping this? Still taking your 2nd year of Algebra? Or do you spend too much time fantasizing about other people's moms?


I've also run 10.5s at 140. I'd guess that's faster than you've ever gone in your life so it would seem I know a little more about going fast than you. John Mihovetz seems to know how to make a really fast car with a small 4.6 without nitromethane. But, I guess 6.25 isn't fast?




I didn't know you wanted to run your car with nitromethane. Why didn't you say so? You conveniently danced around my point with Buddy Ingersol. Care to address that? BTW, the small really high HP engines are well into the 6 second zone now. I also pointed out that I did not state these smaller engines were better than a BBF or BBC. You must like to hear yourself typing on the keyboard.

When the 5.0 or 4.6 3V even gets to the power capability of a traditional SBF or SBC please let me know. When either of those engines makes enough power to turn the blower on a Top Fuel Motor let me know. When 13.30's is considered fast again, also let me know.
 

chrismc

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Posts
286
Reaction score
0
Location
tigard oregon
I didn't pull that out of my ass. Ford 2v's are capable of making much more power than 3v's. More power placed in a lighter chassis will always have the capability to be faster.


hmmmm???so 05-09 mustangs have the capability to be faster then 2010-11. sweet good to know.
 

SlowA$$5.0

Banned
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Posts
681
Reaction score
1
Location
USA
[/B]

hmmmm???so 05-09 mustangs have the capability to be faster then 2010-11. sweet good to know.

If a 05-09 has more power in a lighter chassis then yes it would be possible. You idiots crack me up.
 

Vxer1000

Camaro Can Kicker
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Posts
589
Reaction score
11
Location
Waukegan, Illinois
Your challenge was dumb, but if it makes you feel better.

Sure, you can drive to me and I will gladly drive your car down the track to see how it runs with me driving it. This weekend good?:stfu:

Sure, we'll switch cars and I'll show you how to get a real ET out of yours. That way you can post something in your sig other than "2011 Mustang GT Premium M6, Procharged". Y'know what's funny, I'll bet when you were totally stock you barely ran quicker than my car. But, since you avoided my question about the motorcycle my guess is you would just lie about what you ran "stock" to make yourself look good.
 
Last edited:

Swarzkopf

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Posts
1,887
Reaction score
0
Since you failed to address specific points and/or provide proof or accept my challenge, I will have to assume you are a troll and not here to provide any meaningful input.

Exactly, he's just being a dick.... He's playing on the inferiority complex a lot of our fellow 3V owners have now that the 'yote is out and kicking ass.

When I was a young college-age punk like he is I did the same kind of stuff. LOL
 

Bingo

Because street car
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Posts
7,157
Reaction score
210
Location
Phila, PA
What a dumb fucking conversation. Got yet another idiot here making stupid, false claims about a car based solely on how it does on the track. Hate to break it to you, but some people drive on the street. Variable valve timing? Intake butterflies to increase velocity at low speed? Those two things alone make the 3v better than the modular 2v.
 

pacettr

PJ Lover
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Posts
3,417
Reaction score
14
Location
Yukon, OK
Your in college and you have a new 5.0 with a procharger. I need whatever mommy and daddy you have.

Fixt




I believe it would be hard to argue, even if the fastest 2v is faster than the fastest 3v, the mean and median average would easily favor the 3v.
 

bullitt0482

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Posts
13
Reaction score
0
Sure, we'll switch cars and I'll show you how to get a real ET out of yours. That way you can post something in your sig other than "2011 Mustang GT Premium M6, Procharged". Y'know what's funny, I'll bet when you were totally stock you barely ran quicker than my car. But, since you avoided my question about the motorcycle my guess is you would just lie about what you ran "stock" to make yourself look good.

Call me a cheerleader, but I love bursting people's bubbles....



I ran a 8.1 @ 86 with a 1.86 sixty foot (1/8th). Factory stock (tires, tune, filter, etc). Slip the clutch on launch to keep the rpm's at about 6k, lift shift 2nd, then powershift 3rd and 4th.

That's easily a 12.6-12.8 quarter. Just saying.
 

101fng

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Posts
304
Reaction score
0
When the 5.0 or 4.6 3V even gets to the power capability of a traditional SBF or SBC please let me know. When either of those engines makes enough power to turn the blower on a Top Fuel Motor let me know. When 13.30's is considered fast again, also let me know.

so we were talking about SBF's? slowa$$ made it seem like he was talking about 4.6 2v's which definitely can't power >5L blower
 

Germeezy3

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Posts
3,998
Reaction score
26
so we were talking about SBF's? slowa$$ made it seem like he was talking about 4.6 2v's which definitely can't power >5L blower

My comment was directed to Vxer trying to tell me that the 4V and 3V are so great and that cubic inches is for losers.
 
Back
Top