10.66 at 132mph ....FACTORY STOCK

Discussion in 'Mustang Chit Chat' started by tjm73, Dec 3, 2019.

  1. tjm73

    tjm73 of Omicron Persei 8 S197 Team Member

    9,892
    681
    Reading reports of a kid (SMH) running a GT500 10.66 @ 132.... WOW!!
     
  2. MrAwesome987

    MrAwesome987 forum member

    Age:
    24
    687
    184
    I bet they'll be running 9s in a month or two.
     
  3. TrackpkCoyote13

    TrackpkCoyote13 Junior Member

    15
    1
    An experienced driver in ideal conditions will likely beat this. Very impressive for a track car not optimized for the strip.
     
  4. MrAwesome987

    MrAwesome987 forum member

    Age:
    24
    687
    184
    Lol how much experience does it take with that fancy dual clutch?
     
  5. 01yellerCobra

    01yellerCobra forum member

    2,228
    157
    A guy on SVTP ran 10.60 something his first time ever on a drag strip in a new GT500.
     
  6. TrackpkCoyote13

    TrackpkCoyote13 Junior Member

    15
    1
    Of course an automatic takes very little to no skill, but still if an amateur can go 10.66 at 132, it would be reasonable to say a pro can do more.
     
  7. MrAwesome987

    MrAwesome987 forum member

    Age:
    24
    687
    184
    I wouldn't expect much more out of a truly stock car.
     
  8. OX1

    OX1 forum member

    165
    14
    Didn't appear in video he was having any problem hooking up by just using
    what ever launch control it came with. I think he 60'd a 1.72, which ain't bad on
    a street tire.
     
  9. RED09GT

    RED09GT Senior Member S197 Team Member

    1,939
    159
    Evan Smith's video has been out for almost a month.
    [email protected] at Bradenton with a 1.75 60 ft. Get some drag radials on that beast and see what it can do.
     
  10. Dino Dino Bambino

    Dino Dino Bambino I have a red car

    Age:
    57
    1,418
    293
    Since the GT500 has launch control, even a monkey would get an ET in the 10s. The key figure is the 133mph trap speed. Assuming a race weight of 4400lb, this would suggest the car puts down around 700rwhp.
     
    Bullitt2954 and Racer47 like this.
  11. fdjizm

    fdjizm Drag Queen

    19,247
    237
    It's going to be real easy to run these numbers for the GT500!

    One of the more rabid fanboys on the camaro forum..

    "As far as the quarter mile video, I'll I'll hold off giving any credit until someone a little more honest does it. If it truly does prove to be a mid 10 vehicle then I'll give Ford credit for finally being competitive again after 6 years of darkness."
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
  12. Dino Dino Bambino

    Dino Dino Bambino I have a red car

    Age:
    57
    1,418
    293
    Brenspeed ran it on the dyno yesterday and got 684rwhp @ 524rwtq SAE.



    These guys got similar results with 686rwhp SAE so that's an average of 685rwhp between those two dyno runs. A 10% drivetrain loss would have it right at Ford's claimed 760 crank hp.

     
  13. MrAwesome987

    MrAwesome987 forum member

    Age:
    24
    687
    184
    524 rwtq? What's the Ford rated tq figure?
     
  14. Dino Dino Bambino

    Dino Dino Bambino I have a red car

    Age:
    57
    1,418
    293
    It's 625lbft.
    If you believe a 10% drivetrain loss is correct, the crank numbers would be 760hp & 582lbft.
    If you believe a 16% drivetrain loss is correct, the crank numbers would be 814hp & 624lbft.
    Ford has either overrated the TQ or underrated the HP.
     
  15. MrAwesome987

    MrAwesome987 forum member

    Age:
    24
    687
    184
    Interesting. Thanks.
     
  16. JJ427R

    JJ427R forum member

    1,396
    439
    I'm surprised the 2020 Roush Stage 3 is listing higher torque than the Boss. Is that because of manual trans? Curious how much rwtq difference between an auto and manual? I've been told 13% is number for computing drivetrain loss.

    Roush numbers:
    750hp 670lft
    0-60 3.6 seconds
    11.2s quarter mile no speed listed
    1.07 lateral g
     
  17. Dino Dino Bambino

    Dino Dino Bambino I have a red car

    Age:
    57
    1,418
    293
    It's amazing how many dyno operators still have their minds stuck in the 70s by using a 15% drivetrain loss (divide rwhp/rwtq by 0.85) for a manual and 20% (divide rwhp/rwtq by 0.80) for an automatic. That simply isn't true because there are so many variables, and modern drivetrains have become far more efficient. For any RWD car built from about 2010 onwards, 10% and 12% respectively would be far closer to reality.
     
  18. Dino Dino Bambino

    Dino Dino Bambino I have a red car

    Age:
    57
    1,418
    293
    The 2019 Roush Stage 3 has a Gen 3 Coyote 5.0L engine with an R2650 TVS supercharger set at 12psi maximum boost. Quoted figures are 710hp & 610lbft.
    For 2020, Roush boosted the numbers to 775hp & 670lbft to eclipse the GT500 by 15hp & 45lbft.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2019
  19. JJ427R

    JJ427R forum member

    1,396
    439
    I'd seen the 775 hp earlier, now on the Stage 3 website it shows 750hp, that is where I pulled the numbers from.
     
  20. Dino Dino Bambino

    Dino Dino Bambino I have a red car

    Age:
    57
    1,418
    293
    Yeah, I don't know how Roush found the extra 65hp & 60lbft. Perhaps a freer-flowing exhaust plus revised ECU mapping, perhaps another 2psi of boost, who knows? The Roush Stage 3 is certainly more bang for the buck than the GT500, but the latter is packed with more technology so the choice is down to budget and personal taste. A GT350 with a Whipple supercharger is also up there performance-wise and costs even less than both of the aforementioned.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.