bullittrevor
Senior Member
Yeah I think that's his unsername. Unless he changed it from when they tore down the motor? Maybe he will chime in
Btw I think it's a d1.
Another line of bullshit. No way you are going to improve the efficiency of this engine by that much
Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
Wally and Ben are co-owners. Im not sure of the names of the other 2 guys who work there. I didnt know any of them use to work at strictly.So what strictly employees move out to this new shop? I saw a black lightning just yesterday with their decal on the back window
Chididdy mentioned they did thats why I was asking
Because this video and story keeps persisting around the net, I decided to do some math.
Using the graph they posted and knowing it's dyno dynamics, I will predict that car made around 670-700 rwhp. Right where it should by leaning on a P1.
The dyno dynamics dyno measures torque via it's torque cell. So let's just assume it's calculated correctly (might not be)
It says 558 rwtq (peak)
Let's just say peak torque is around 5,000 (their RPM is obviously off causing the problem)
That would mean it makes 559 rwhp at 5,000
Extrapolating that up to low 7,000 RPM range I come up with 667 rwhp.
Remember,
HP = (RPM*TQ)/5252
So if RPM is off, HP will be off.
This works the opposite on a dynojet and why they probably thought having the RPM off wasn't a problem. They must not be familar with their own equipment.
To sum it up,
Dynojet measures HP and calculates Torque. If RPM is off, HP will be correct and Tq will not.
Dyno Dynamics measures TQ and calculates HP. If RPM is off, TQ will be correct and HP will be wrong.
Do I get a gold star?

I would be nervous as hell staying WOT for 1 mile on that time bomb, every moment wondering when I would send a rod over to jesusApology not accepted! Haha
We'll see what the car does in the Texas Mile as he states that is what the build is for.
