JEWC_Motorsports
S197 Junkie
Lol Bobby, you can blame Greg.
I know some people are probably looking for concrete info.
http://www.dragzine.com/tech-stories/engine/review-petersons-externally-vented-air-oil-separator/
Question i still have is, If you can remove 99% of the oil in the air is it better to reconnect back to intake for crankcase vacuum (NA car)?
I know some people are probably looking for concrete info.
http://www.dragzine.com/tech-stories/engine/review-petersons-externally-vented-air-oil-separator/
Question i still have is, If you can remove 99% of the oil in the air is it better to reconnect back to intake for crankcase vacuum (NA car)?
Also, I find it interesting, in the dragzine article, that the vacuum hose is on the bottom of the can where the oil would be deposited. Wouldn't that allow for oil to be sucked into the intake?
d.
So the simplest and cheapest solution, breathers on both valve covers, are out. As is running a vented catch can with a t on one input hooked up to both valve covers. Kind of a bummer to read this. I was really hoping to avoid having to run two separate cans with the hassle of mounting and running all those lines.There are bunch of business and web sites explaining why you always want a vacuum in the crankcase. Crankcase filters were alright in the 50s when we didn't know better now it is ignorant and lazy.

So the simplest and cheapest solution, breathers on both valve covers, are out. As is running a vented catch can with a t on one input hooked up to both valve covers. Kind of a bummer to read this. I was really hoping to avoid having to run two separate cans with the hassle of mounting and running all those lines.
![]()
If you want to use bigger separators and don't want them flopping around in there loose then probably not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatwat