---NOTICE OF RETRACTION---
Please note that I corrected my earlier cranial-rectal inversion in post number 15 of this thread... That said:
65SOHC: you got me dead to rights, although you missed my retraction, so one demerit for you!
Gig: When I screw up, call me on it!! No demerits, but six asshole points!
Marc (OMG that is too funny!!!) You're absolutely right! And yes, I think Stanley needs better drugs too!
2K05GT-- Think it through. Smaller crank pulley means less belt travel per pulley rev, thus the underdrive. With the water pump pulley being larger, that means that it will take
more belt travel to create a revolution. The net result is that the water pump is spinning seriously slower than stock. Think of it this way: If you want to increase boost with a blower, you first run smaller and smaller blower pulleys, so that a given amount of belt travel will result in more input shaft revolutions. OR you increase the diameter of the crank pulley, so that there is more belt travel per driven revolution. NO asshole points for you!!
Seriously, guys, I screwed the pooch and freely admit to it. I was in a rush, thinking of other things (work related, unfortunately) and just got my head twisted around with which was driving and which was driven. My bad. Now, can't we all just get along???