Ford racing intake manifold

[3vs197]

iceguyb14, you are correct sir. with the same mods as you i ran a 12.9@107, never had it on the dyno then. after adding cams/lt's i gained 2-3mph and about .2 in the quarter. the lt's didnt go a thing, that was all in the cams.

 

[iceguyb14]

iceguyb14, you are correct sir. with the same mods as you i ran a 12.9@107, never had it on the dyno then. after adding cams/lt's i gained 2-3mph and about .2 in the quarter. the lt's didnt go a thing, that was all in the cams.

you should update your sig with new times. and yeah with some better tires than the stock 235s im expecting around 12.7-12.8 this spring, still on street tires. but we'll see.

the longtubes didnt do a thing?? thats crazy

 

[3vs197]

my sig is a joke for all the retards who don't believe my 60 foot with fuzion street tires. i ran a 12.60@109 with a 1.73 short time and a 12.9@110 with a 1.9 short time. best trap i could get out of it before LT's and cams was 107.00 and 100% of that gain was the cams. i already had an off road and mid and different mufflers and thats already most of the gain when people do LT's and mid and axle back at the same time from stock cats.

 

[Greg Hazlett]

Sigh...here we go again with this POS posting idiotic stuff again...for all the "retards" on here how in the world would we know what your 60 ft time was and with what tires...what a fucktard.

 

[06MUSTANGGT24V]

my sig is a joke for all the retards who don't believe my 60 foot with fuzion street tires. i ran a 12.60@109 with a 1.73 short time and a 12.9@110 with a 1.9 short time. best trap i could get out of it before LT's and cams was 107.00 and 100% of that gain was the cams. i already had an off road and mid and different mufflers and thats already most of the gain when people do LT's and mid and axle back at the same time from stock cats.

What was your 1/8 mile time and mph?

 

[iceguyb14]

my sig is a joke for all the retards who don't believe my 60 foot with fuzion street tires. i ran a 12.60@109 with a 1.73 short time and a 12.9@110 with a 1.9 short time. best trap i could get out of it before LT's and cams was 107.00 and 100% of that gain was the cams. i already had an off road and mid and different mufflers and thats already most of the gain when people do LT's and mid and axle back at the same time from stock cats.

People aren't "retards" when they don't believe that. A lot of people struggle to get 1.73 60' times with wide drag radials. Therefore it's hard to believe someone did that on fuzions. Maybe something was wrong with the timing at the track. I know I went to a track when my car was stock with an exhaust and in the left lane it said I was running a 1.7x 60' time which I know was not the case.

What was your 1/8 mile time and mph?

+1

 

[3vs197]

i was referring more to people with the persona "well if i cant do it, its not possible." there were people on here wanting video proof and when i got it they said "how do we know its your car?" my worst short time in the car was 1.92 or something like that.

and i see what you mean about the timing but i have taken the car to several tracks and my 60's have been consistently 1.7x-1.8x on my fuzions.

my 1/8 was 8.0 and the mph was something like 84-86, somthing like that, i dont have my slips with me right now.

 

[MOTORCITYBADBOY]

This thread has completely departed from an informative discussion on tech....

 

[mustangflanagan]

i am thinking about getting the manifold to go along with the 127450 cams going in and a 3.55 pulley. i currently have a 302 stroker with ap1 stage 2 procharger,cmdp, offroad H 60 inj, gt500 fuel pumps, anyone have any ideas what type of gains i would gain or if it is even worth it?

 

[nasty281]

Did anyone consider the absence of the accessory drive that adds HP too.. maybe that's why its at 343hp plus I'm sure there running longtubes in the test

 

[kevinatfms]

Stick or auto? What dyno? STD or SAE?

No fucking way cams and heads gets you 130 hp...BULL FUCKING SHIT.

im going to X 1,000,000. i have heads and cams and i cannot brake 360rwhp.... i have seen people with maxed out heads/cams/compression just barely tip over 400rwhp.

your shop is feeding you bullshit with a silver spoon

 

[1lowtoy]

i am thinking about getting the manifold to go along with the 127450 cams going in and a 3.55 pulley. i currently have a 302 stroker with ap1 stage 2 procharger,cmdp, offroad H 60 inj, gt500 fuel pumps, anyone have any ideas what type of gains i would gain or if it is even worth it?

How much power are you making right now?

 

[1lowtoy]

im going to X 1,000,000. i have heads and cams and i cannot brake 360rwhp.... i have seen people with maxed out heads/cams/compression just barely tip over 400rwhp.

your shop is feeding you bullshit with a silver spoon

He meant 370hp not 470.

 

[Noclutch]

time warp

 

[mustangflanagan]

How much power are you making right now?

right now i am making 498rwhp and 463 tq on 10 psi , without cams. i am either gonna go with 127450 or 550 idk yet. i gotta pass nj damn emissions, i know 450 will but idk if the 550 will or not.

 

[HAPPY HIPPO]

wasted my time today

I can't believe I read all of this. Thanks alot. threads like this should come with a warning to readers.

 

[Dillon Dollar]

im going to X 1,000,000. i have heads and cams and i cannot brake 360rwhp.... i have seen people with maxed out heads/cams/compression just barely tip over 400rwhp.

your shop is feeding you bullshit with a silver spoon

I broke 370 hp with low compression 9-1 BBR STage 2 cams BBR heas and frpp manifold made 370 on two seperate dynos as well in about 80 degree weather this was before the blower

 

[Chris B.]

I've gotten some conflicting opinions on delete plates v the F/R intake manifold. I was told by several knowledgeable folks the new manifold was the way to go, I'd see 20-30 RWHP from that mod alone. Another knowledgeable gent felt directly otherwise & thought delete plates were more effective, especially for the goals I'm looking for in my daily driver Bullitt. I'm not necessarily interested in peak power as much as improved bottom/mid-range drivability.

Then I found an article on the net (http://www.musclemustangfastfords.com/tech/mmfp_1009_ford_racing_three_valve_intake _manifold_testing/index.html) that clearly indicated the F/R manifold on a basic stock 4.6 actually lost power thru-out the power band. If the 4.6 was modded w/new cams, top end stuff, it gained but I'm probably not gonna do either.

Anybody got an experiences w/the FR intake manifold?

I thought about getting the FRPP manifold for a long time and looked at many before and after dyno results with various combinations. Depending on what mods you have for a naturally aspirated 3V with stock heads, the FRPP manifold doesn't make more power than the stock manifold until somewhere above 5700-6200 RPM and makes less power below that RPM range. For many of us that's useless unless we raise the rev limiter to the 6800-7000+ RPM range and have the mods required to support making power int hat higher RPM range along with better valve springs if we regularly operate our engines around 7000 RPM.

If your just have a few bolt on mods, its probably not worth it and you should spend your money elsewhere.

 

[BruceH]

I've had the frpp manifold on a na motor. I had zero hp gains and tq loss. In my experience with both the frpp and stock manifolds the stock is the better of the two for na.

My mods at the time were 11:1 compression ratio, cai, and 127400 cams. Gasoline hp was 335 E85 hp was 346.

Edit: The stock manifold flows over 1000 cfm, pretty hard to max that out na.

 

[WHATISJDM]

there was way to much testosterone running through this thread