considering supercharger

pics06gtstang

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2015
Posts
398
Reaction score
2
Location
SWFL n ft myers
considering adding a supercharger to my 07 gt convertible.. whos the best.. without blowing motor all to hell whats the safe hp range.. car has 108k on the clock and it is an automatic..

saw this one already
http://www.brenspeed.com/bren520r.html#scProductReviews|undefined3
think it might be much for my motor tho
thanks charles
if your looking @ brenspeed then check out the novi 2200 and just have them do a good conservative tune around 435 @ the RW and you should be fine for a while .
just my 2 cents .
http://www.brenspeed.com/paxtonsatinsl.html
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Posts
498
Reaction score
5
Location
Northwest Subs Chicago
Truth. 05-09 best years

This is the hard part, giving up the body style.

It's an expensive body style and Ford in my opinion is making even more expensive with the increasing costs for engine replacement parts and limited options for short blocks. It's over 5k for a steel B53 block and a good 4,6 aluminum shortblocks built by performance shops are just as expensive.
 

eighty6gt

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Posts
4,306
Reaction score
416
05-09 v6 hulls can probably be had for near free - then go with LS or 5.0 or windsor power. Lito and others have demonstrated the wiring isn't anything to be afraid of.
 

06redgt

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Posts
159
Reaction score
13
Location
Oswego, Illinois
This is the hard part, giving up the body style.

It's an expensive body style and Ford in my opinion is making even more expensive with the increasing costs for engine replacement parts and limited options for short blocks. It's over 5k for a steel B53 block and a good 4,6 aluminum shortblocks built by performance shops are just as expensive.

Since my car was paid for it made for an easier decision. Either trade my car in on a new 15 and pay 20,000 or pay 6,000 and get a Procharger. Now I not only have a car that is paid for, but it also makes 500 to the wheels!

You actually helped me load the Procharger kit into my car since the box wouldn't fit in my trunk last July. Small world!
 

BruceH

BBB Big Bore Boss 322
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Posts
13,810
Reaction score
21
Location
Pacific Northwest
I've seen 427 cars, but that isn't cost effective. Are you talking about the 5.0 swap?

I'm mostly referring to putting a Windsor in a s197. It makes zero sense at all. The block will break at the point a 4.6 is just getting started. Then there's all the benefits of having an ecu. I suppose you could go stand alone on a W motor but why put all that time and energy into a project that has a finite hp limit due to block constraints and will never have the driveability of a modern mod motor? To me it makes no sense at all.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Posts
498
Reaction score
5
Location
Northwest Subs Chicago
Since my car was paid for it made for an easier decision. Either trade my car in on a new 15 and pay 20,000 or pay 6,000 and get a Procharger. Now I not only have a car that is paid for, but it also makes 500 to the wheels!

You actually helped me load the Procharger kit into my car since the box wouldn't fit in my trunk last July. Small world!

Yep I remember you, I also remember how immaculate your ride was inside and out and was wondering how we were going to fit all that into the car without scuffing it up. Sounds like the install went well, those Prochargers can be a knuckle buster. Did you come back and get a custom tune at the dyno shop or did you run the package tune and do some pulls at a dyno day?

In any case your car was sick and extremely clean, you really take great care of your ride.:beer:
 

BLAKE

Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Posts
109
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Worth, TX
Agreed on the Ford racing option. Another is the Edelbrock e-force. In its stage 1 form, it's adding well over 100hp at around 5lbs of boost, so it's not beating on those toothpick rods too hard. Another factor is the valve that keeps it out of boost if your foot isn't in it so that helps preserve both the bottom end and gas mileage. That's what I have, and while I don't have a ton of time with it yet, it seems pretty solid.
 

eighty6gt

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Posts
4,306
Reaction score
416
I'm mostly referring to putting a Windsor in a s197. It makes zero sense at all. The block will break at the point a 4.6 is just getting started. Then there's all the benefits of having an ecu. I suppose you could go stand alone on a W motor but why put all that time and energy into a project that has a finite hp limit due to block constraints and will never have the driveability of a modern mod motor? To me it makes no sense at all.

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/fms-m6007z427frt

I think the FRPP 500-ish hp example has a strengthened block (boss.) Somewhere around $10,000 OTD. I suspect you could run this engine on the stock ECU if you wanted to - provided you could ignore the cam data - but there are numerous aftermarket solutions for a couple grand.

Can you get to 500 n/a hp with a 5.3? I'm forgetting what your car made, I think it was close. Edit: right on the money. I'd expect the 427 would make a lot more torque. I think it would be a fine street machine.
 
Last edited:

BruceH

BBB Big Bore Boss 322
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Posts
13,810
Reaction score
21
Location
Pacific Northwest
http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/fms-m6007z427frt

I think the FRPP 500-ish hp example has a strengthened block (boss.) Somewhere around $10,000 OTD. I suspect you could run this engine on the stock ECU if you wanted to - provided you could ignore the cam data - but there are numerous aftermarket solutions for a couple grand.

Can you get to 500 n/a hp with a 5.3? I'm forgetting what your car made, I think it was close. Edit: right on the money. I'd expect the 427 would make a lot more torque. I think it would be a fine street machine.

Still makes zero sense to me. Going backwards about 30 years for less power and torque than a bolt on supercharger would provide with a stock 4.6 3v.

I grew up in the age of distributors and carburetors. I don't miss either component and can't comprehend why anyone would want to spend big money to go backwards. There isn't any advantage to be had. But that's me.
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top