Will a SCT 3015 be ok to do this?If you're still running the crappy stock tune, an aftermarket tune will definitely help. Contact the tuning department at Brenspeed. They can send you a custom email tune that you can upload into your ECU with a handheld tuner such as the SCT X4.
I've been running the same Brenspeed tune on my 06 GT for the past 12 years and the difference from stock was night and day.
Google it but I'm pretty sure they're about the same. The US uses a different measuring method that gives the lower rating.We have 95 in the UK, is that the same a US 91?
I think you'll want the X4 to do the custom tunes and stuff but if you have access to an affordable used (and unlocked!) 3015 I ran the canned SCT tune on my car for a little bit and it, while not perfect, was much better than factory.Will a SCT 3015 be ok to do this?
Yes Laurence, I looked this up a while back as I am in the process of getting a tune from Lito. I personally wouldn't run my Mustang on E10, its pure rubbish, although with the price of fuel ATM I can understand the E10 argument LOLWe have 95 in the UK, is that the same a US 91?
In case you didn't know Kev, all petrol (gasoline) sold in Europe is currently E10 (stoich air:fuel ratio 14.1) and our Mustangs run fine on it. The ethanol content was fairly recently increased from 5% to reduce CO2 emissions.Yes Laurence, I looked this up a while back as I am in the process of getting a tune from Lito. I personally wouldn't run my Mustang on E10, its pure rubbish, although with the price of fuel ATM I can understand the E10 argument LOL
Laurence Dunn said:We have 95 in the UK, is that the same a US 91?
I will double check Dino but i am nearly sure the 97 Ron super unleaded is still E5 at my local pumps but because I haven't been out in the Mustang this year yet so I don't know if its recently changed?. I have used the 95 Ron but I use 97 on all my 2 stroke and gardening tools. I have found 2 strokes are smokie as hell on the E10 due to it being hygroscopic, especially in my climate. My Mustang just seems that bit livelier and runs sweeter with E5 97 that's why I brim the tank with it before locking her away for the winter. In the summer months I sometimes mix E5 and E10 50/50 in a tankful if I'm feeling begrudging to the billionaire oil companiesIn case you didn't know Kev, all petrol (gasoline) sold in Europe is currently E10 (stoich air:fuel ratio 14.1) and our Mustangs run fine on it. The ethanol content was fairly recently increased from 5% to reduce CO2 emissions.
Pretty much. European 95 RON octane is equivalent to 91 R&M/2 octane. However European petrol has a 10% ethanol content so it's E10. That entails a slightly lower 14.1 stoichiometric air:fuel ratio compared to 14.7 for pure gasoline, and means that the engine will run slightly leaner on E10 if it's tuned for pure gasoline but not enough to require a retune. If one was obsessive about getting a ECU retune though, a simple adjustment of a commanded 1.0 lambda from 14.7 to 14.1 is all that's required.
For what it's worth my 06 GT is tuned for 91 US octane pure gasoline, goes like a raped ape, and delivers pretty good fuel economy too (33-34 Imperial mpg at 70mph GPS motorway cruise).

So looks like they possibly intend do drive us S197 owners off the road eventually by introducing E15(America) and E20 fuel in Europe unless E10 will still be available? or will somebody come up with an additive for our fuel tanks as Ford are saying only 2014> mustangs are E15 compatible?This is only valid for the ethanol part of it and it is debatable. Distilled EtOH cannot be used for fuel, too much water in it, therefore the residual water must be removed on the chemical way which is energy intensive. For E10 itself a good rule of thumb is a 5% stellar carbon reduction.Standard E10: E10 is now standard in most EU countries, offering a 79% reduction in GHG emissions compared to fossil petrol.
Interesting comment Griff as I've heard other local mechanics and people who work with petrol engines in general comment that E10 is full of water. I don't read into this sort of stuff as my head is full enough. But I do see by checking Google that the UK uses bioethanol in which contains 3-4% water. That's very little so I don't see an valid argument for "its full of water". I do see however its hygroscopic which is a concern as transport, storage and other factors could raise the water content more in the right climate before you take ownership of it. Now I have gone down the Google rabbit hole on E10, the more I read the more concerning it is.This is only valid for the ethanol part of it and it is debatable. Distilled EtOH cannot be used for fuel, too much water in it, therefore the residual water must be removed on the chemical way which is energy intensive. For E10 itself a good rule of thumb is a 5% stellar carbon reduction.
I marked the E10 in the diagram with the green dot. That means if you increase the water content only a few percent, the fuel will separate into two phases. Therefore you must use 100% water free ethanol for production. Destillation gives you only 96% of ethanol (azeotropic mixture). When E10 absorbs water from the air it separates into two phases when it reaches around 0.5% (I had a wrong number in my mind, sorry), that is the reason why it is only stable for 3-6 month. Then you have a Ethanol/Water phase which ignites bad and a low octane fuel phase.Interesting comment Griff as I've heard other local mechanics and people who work with petrol engines in general comment that E10 is full of water. I don't read into this sort of stuff as my head is full enough. But I do see by checking Google that the UK uses bioethanol in which contains 3-4% water. That's very little so I don't see an valid argument for "its full of water". I do see however its hygroscopic which is a concern as transport, storage and other factors could raise the water content more in the right climate before you take ownership of it. Now I have gone down the Google rabbit hole on E10, the more I read the more concerning it is.
