Educate me on direct injection

Greg Hazlett

Stepping on the Pink Bus
Official Vendor
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Posts
23,982
Reaction score
340
Location
Chesapeake, VA
I read numerous cars using it and picking up hp gains but I don't understand why; how can engines be more powerful/efficient by DI?

If it is that good why doesn't everyone do it?

Does it cost that much more?

Does it still use a fuel injector but in a different place?

My Focus is DI and some of the people on the focus forum said the oil smells like gas and were wondering if the gas would somehow get by and thin out the oil...?

Would a catch can be a good idea on a DI engine or no different than a non DI engine?

:helpme:
 

BlackSunshine

Power Downshifter
Joined
May 4, 2010
Posts
823
Reaction score
3
Location
Toronto, Ontario
<H1 class=firstHeading id=firstHeading>Gasoline direct injection
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
In internal combustion engines, gasoline direct injection (GDI), also known as petrol direct injection or direct petrol injection, is a variant of fuel injection employed in modern two-stroke and four-stroke gasoline engines. The gasoline is highly pressurized, and injected via a common rail fuel line directly into the combustion chamber of each cylinder, as opposed to conventional multi-point fuel injection that happens in the intake tract, or cylinder port.
In some applications, gasoline direct injection enables a stratified fuel charge (ultra lean burn) combustion for improved fuel efficiency, and reduced emission levels at low load.



Theory of operation
The major advantages of a GDI engine are increased fuel efficiency and high power output. Emissions levels can also be more accurately controlled with the GDI system. The cited gains are achieved by the precise control over the amount of fuel and injection timings that are varied according to the load conditions. In addition, there are no throttling losses in some GDI engines, when compared to a conventional fuel-injected or carbureted engine, which greatly improves efficiency, and reduces 'pumping losses' in engines without a throttle plate. Engine speed is controlled by the engine control unit/engine management system (EMS), which regulates fuel injection function and ignition timing, instead of having a throttle plate that restricts the incoming air supply. Adding this function to the EMS requires considerable enhancement of its processing and memory, as direct injection plus the engine speed management must have very precise algorithms for good performance and drivability.
The engine management system continually chooses among three combustion modes: ultra lean burn, stoichiometric, and full power output. Each mode is characterized by the air-fuel ratio. The stoichiometric air-fuel ratio for gasoline is 14.7:1 by weight, but ultra lean mode can involve ratios as high as 65:1 (or even higher in some engines, for very limited periods). These mixtures are much leaner than in a conventional engine and reduce fuel consumption considerably.
  • Ultra lean burn mode is used for light-load running conditions, at constant or reducing road speeds, where no acceleration is required. The fuel is not injected at the intake stroke but rather at the latter stages of the compression stroke, so that the small amount of air-fuel mixture is optimally placed near the spark plug. This stratified charge is surrounded mostly by air, which keeps the fuel and the flame away from the cylinder walls for lowest emissions and heat losses. The combustion takes place in a toroidal (donut-shaped) cavity on the piston's surface.[1] The cavity is displaced to one side of the piston, the side that has the fuel injector. This technique enables the use of ultra-lean mixtures that would be impossible with carburetors or conventional fuel injection.
  • Stoichiometric mode is used for moderate load conditions. Fuel is injected during the intake stroke, creating a homogenous fuel-air mixture in the cylinder. From the stoichiometric ratio, an optimum burn results in a clean exhaust emission, further cleaned by the catalytic converter.
  • Full power mode is used for rapid acceleration and heavy loads (as when climbing a hill). The air-fuel mixture is homogenous and the ratio is slightly richer than stoichiometric, which helps prevent knock (pinging). The fuel is injected during the intake stroke.
Direct injection may also be accompanied by other engine technologies such as variable valve timing (VVT) and tuned/multi path or variable length intake manifolding (VLIM, or VIM). Water injection or (more commonly) exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) may help reduce the high nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions that can result from burning ultra lean mixtures.
It is also possible to inject more than once during a single cycle. After the first fuel charge has been ignited, it is possible to add fuel as the piston descends. The benefits are more power and economy, but certain octane fuels have been seen to cause exhaust valve erosion. For this reason, most companies have ceased to use the Fuel Stratified Injection (FSI) operation during normal running.
Tuning up an early generation FSI power plant to generate higher power is difficult, since the only time it is possible to inject fuel is during the induction phase. Conventional injection engines can inject throughout the 4-stroke sequence, as the injector squirts onto the back of a closed valve. A direct injection engine, where the injector injects directly into the cylinder, is limited to the suction stroke of the piston. As the RPM increases, the time available to inject fuel decreases. Newer FSI systems that have sufficient fuel pressure to inject even late in compression phase do not suffer to the same extent; however, they still do not inject during the exhaust cycle (they could but it would just waste fuel). Hence, all other factors being equal, an FSI engine needs higher-capacity injectors to achieve the same power as a conventional engine.
</H1>
Basically its a more effecient way of fuel delivery. I always understood the concept but never really cared much to read up about it until now lol.
 

Racer47

Doesn't have much to say
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Posts
1,107
Reaction score
353
Location
SE Wis
To the best of my knowledge direct injection is able to run much leaner at light loads. The fuel is injected and burns in the center of the combustion chamber with air all around it. So that even though it is lean the heat stays in the center and off the piston and cylinder walls.

Under higher loads it runs more like regular injection at normal a/f ratios. The negative is higher fuel pressure needed and more expensive injectors. All the Ford eco boost engines are DI with light turbo boost.

There is a fair amount of light load and some idling in the EPA mileage tests so DI helps boost the mpg numbers.
 

Racer47

Doesn't have much to say
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Posts
1,107
Reaction score
353
Location
SE Wis
well in the time it took me to type my reply blacksunshine slid in his reply first, kinda the same answer tho
 

JeremyH

3V Fuel Guru
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
20,857
Reaction score
206
Location
Virginia Beach
Plain and simple, more efficient combustion. The fuel is injected directly into the chamber which allows for less fuel and more power with a more complete burn, less emmissions too.
 

BruceH

BBB Big Bore Boss 322
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Posts
13,810
Reaction score
21
Location
Pacific Northwest
I read numerous cars using it and picking up hp gains but I don't understand why; how can engines be more powerful/efficient by DI?

If it is that good why doesn't everyone do it?

Does it cost that much more?

Does it still use a fuel injector but in a different place?

My Focus is DI and some of the people on the focus forum said the oil smells like gas and were wondering if the gas would somehow get by and thin out the oil...?

Would a catch can be a good idea on a DI engine or no different than a non DI engine?

:helpme:

Greg,

Keep it stock and let Ford worry about it. I'm purposely staying away from Focus forums. The car runs fantasic, gets good mileage, I like the automatic shifting manual transmission and it's great in the snow.

BTW it sounds like some oil selling hype is about to happen over on those forums, a new car "potential problem" isn't a problem on a non-modified car. The worst case would be Ford has to fix it.
 

Greg Hazlett

Stepping on the Pink Bus
Official Vendor
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Posts
23,982
Reaction score
340
Location
Chesapeake, VA
Greg,

Keep it stock and let Ford worry about it. I'm purposely staying away from Focus forums. The car runs fantasic, gets good mileage, I like the automatic shifting manual transmission and it's great in the snow.

BTW it sounds like some oil selling hype is about to happen over on those forums, a new car "potential problem" isn't a problem on a non-modified car. The worst case would be Ford has to fix it.

There are some clowns on there, that's for sure! I received an infraction point because I called someone named Rat Fink and idiot....wow....hope none of them ever venture on here!

I understand about leaving it alone but look at how well the oil catch cans work on our cars....I took it by JLT's to have Jay look at it but there is only 1 line coming off the back of the VC that is plumbed back into the intake that I was going to put a catch can on but neither of knew enought about DI to know if it would help or not.
 

JeremyH

3V Fuel Guru
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
20,857
Reaction score
206
Location
Virginia Beach
But does it still have a traditonal fuel injector?


No, its different has to withstand heat and pressure in the combustion chamber like a spark plug. Think of it as a spark plug that you screw into the head into the chamber only its a fuel injector! lol
 

Riptide

Will work for Mustang.
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Posts
5,248
Reaction score
17
Location
Montucky
I have heard some pretty fantastic claims about DI increasing power output 10+ percent. From what I have read however the truth is you're looking at much closer to 5 percent.
 

Greg Hazlett

Stepping on the Pink Bus
Official Vendor
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Posts
23,982
Reaction score
340
Location
Chesapeake, VA
Ok, that makes sense...now...what about the other questions?

I need to see what the CR is for the 2.0 on the focus....
 

Riptide

Will work for Mustang.
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Posts
5,248
Reaction score
17
Location
Montucky
We have an 09 focus and while it's not a bad little econobox it has been god awful in the snow. We can't even get that car out of the driveway without pushing if there is more than 3" of snow on the ground. Seriously it's a pita.

I'm assuming you guys have the new euro spec ones. Congrats. Nice little cars.
 

BlackSunshine

Power Downshifter
Joined
May 4, 2010
Posts
823
Reaction score
3
Location
Toronto, Ontario
As for the question as to why everybody doesn't use it I would venture to say, just like any new technology, this would require a complete re-tooling of existing fuel systems and cylinder heads. Then it becomes more of a cost/benefit ratio if this technology would benefit the company enough to justify the cost.

There should be no reason the fuel is passing the rings during normal operating conditions as it still operates the same as a normal combustion cycle. Only reason fuel should be passig the rings is in a wash down condition. Given that DI should be more effecient and create a more complete burn, the lieklyhood of a wash down condition should be next to none.

Not too sure how or why blow-by would be affected by using DI and my uneducated guess would be that the catch can would work in the same manner as in a normal combustion engine same as a DI engine, but again, thats just speculation. I just don't see a correlation, maybe you can enlighten me as to your thought process?
 

mot250

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Posts
137
Reaction score
0
DI can be bad if the chamber is not designed properly and the fuel mapping isn't correct. Some early DI pioneers (I can't remember which manufacturers but they were not domestic) had issues with their DI engines developing severe HP robbing carbon deposits within 10000 to 20000 miles, or even sooner.

But I think all manufactures got it figured out by now. Just be wary of older used cars with DI.
 

Greg Hazlett

Stepping on the Pink Bus
Official Vendor
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Posts
23,982
Reaction score
340
Location
Chesapeake, VA
That's what I wanted to clear up; I was under the assumption that the rings still kept the fuel from the oil but since I was unclear as to how DI worked I asked.

Not sure if the larger the engine the more vapors in the return line that a catch can would help, I always thought a catch can was more beneficial on FI cars but on here the NA guys see just as much if not more oil in their catch cans.
 

BruceH

BBB Big Bore Boss 322
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Posts
13,810
Reaction score
21
Location
Pacific Northwest
Ok, that makes sense...now...what about the other questions?

I need to see what the CR is for the 2.0 on the focus....

12:1. It was originally designed for flex fuel but Ford changed the spec at the last minute. It can use 87 octane at 12:1 by retarding the exhaust cam. TiVCT is pretty cool. The flex calibration would of sensed e85 and changed not only spark timing but cam timing too.
 

NickSezz

NJSEOS
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Posts
475
Reaction score
0
Location
NJ
One of my buddies has a 400+ whp TT 335i by just adding some intakes, tuning, and meth kit. He was telling me how the DI is preventing those guys from making big power because of fuel issues. The DI uses a high pressure pump that has been known to fail even in stock application, and the availability of after market high pressure pumps and bigger CC fuel injectors are not as readily available as the type of hardware we use. I think the guys making big power on those I-6 cars use some kind of secondary injection with normal solenoid injectors before the vales. No expert here...just hear say...

Thought this was interesting:
http://automotivethinker.com/engines/direct-injection-and-dirty-intake-valves/

So the issue seems to be just a case of DI being a newer technology and has not been adopted by all just yet. Give it 5 years...

I though I remember reading somewhere that the new 5.0 has some extra tooling on an area of the head/block that looks like it make be used for a future DI application.

http://www.stangtv.com/news/future-mustang-5-0-to-get-direct-injection/
 

Towelly

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Posts
969
Reaction score
2
One of my buddies has a 400+ whp TT 335i by just adding some intakes, tuning, and meth kit. He was telling me how the DI is preventing those guys from making big power because of fuel issues. The DI uses a high pressure pump that has been known to fail even in stock application, and the availability of after market high pressure pumps and bigger CC fuel injectors are not as readily available as the type of hardware we use. I think the guys making big power on those I-6 cars use some kind of secondary injection with normal solenoid injectors before the vales. No expert here...just hear say...

Thought this was interesting:
http://automotivethinker.com/engines/direct-injection-and-dirty-intake-valves/

So the issue seems to be just a case of DI being a newer technology and has not been adopted by all just yet. Give it 5 years...

I though I remember reading somewhere that the new 5.0 has some extra tooling on an area of the head/block that looks like it make be used for a future DI application.

http://www.stangtv.com/news/future-mustang-5-0-to-get-direct-injection/


Just a FYI, Ford doesn't use a high pressure pump anymore. They don't have to. The injectors compress the fuel internally now via piezoelectric crystals within the injector. Using this the DI diesel injectors can create 26,500PSI. No need for a high pressure pump now.

How they work:
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/tech-department-piezo-fuel-injectors-explained


Edit: 29,000PSI now...

The high-pressure Bosch fuel system injects fuel at more than 29,000 psi. The system delivers up to five injection events per cylinder per cycle using eight-hole piezo injectors to spray fuel into the piston bowl. The direct-injection system is calibrated and phased for optimum power, fuel efficiency and NVH

http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=30879
 
Last edited:
Back
Top