Procharger dyno results.

Marc s

NASA AIX
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Posts
3,867
Reaction score
29
Location
Auburn, WA
I recently purchased a tuner D1SC from a local dealer, installed it last week and dyno tuned on Friday on a Mustang dyno. The mods to my car are, Mac L/T, O/R Prochamber, Mac mufflers, and FRPP cams. I ordered the kit with a 4.13" pulley because Procharger said with my exhaust, it will make around 9-10 lbs of boost. I also ordered some smaller pulleys just in case I needed them. After sorting out the base line tune for the larger injectors and the relocated MAF in the intercooler. The first dyno pull showed the A/F at 12.4 and the timing at 20 degrees so I shut it off at early. The HP was 513 HP @ 5000 RPM's. Yikes! I fattend the tune up, pulled some timing, and made another pull. 12.2 A/F, timing at 19 degrees, 14.2 lbs of boost. The results were a SAE corrected 586 HP, 513 ft lbs at 6200 RPM's. Well, the rods were still in the motor! I fattend the tune up to 11.6, pulled the timing back to 16 degrees, lowered the rev limiter to 6200 and made another pull. 533 HP 467 ft lbs at 6000.

I quess I will be short shifting this thing until I get my new short block installed.

I was surprised that the FRPP cams with a tight LSA of 110 degrees made so much boost.
 

GrnBullitt08

Dale Jr
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Posts
15,081
Reaction score
199
Location
Northwest Indiana
Damn thats impressive. Thats alot of power for a larger pulley like that. I definitley would be taking it easy on that motor. The stock rods arent going to care for that kind of power.
 

05yellowgt

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Posts
2,456
Reaction score
5
Location
Dayton, OH
That's nothing to shake a stick at! You'll love the kind of power you can make with that thing once you have a shortblock that can handle it.
 

Alter Ego Trip

Pot Stirring Aficianado
Joined
May 9, 2010
Posts
1,733
Reaction score
26
Location
White room with padded walls
I'm going to have to call BS. 586 hp on a Mustang dyno is equivalent to about 650 on a Dynojet (figured conservatively). I just don't see it making that, or the rods holding together at that amount of power. Especially as I don't see any serious fuel upgrades in your sig.
 

BAKnBLK2010

Harley Davidson FLHTCI
Joined
May 12, 2010
Posts
3,280
Reaction score
8
Location
Sandy Hook Kentucky
I'm going to have to call BS. 586 hp on a Mustang dyno is equivalent to about 650 on a Dynojet (figured conservatively). I just don't see it making that, or the rods holding together at that amount of power. Especially as I don't see any serious fuel upgrades in your sig.


:popcorneat:
 

Blxcklist

Hi Im Justin
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Posts
4,361
Reaction score
107
Location
Idaho
14 psi and stock compression. Its believable to get those numbers, but your stock bottom end wont take that abuse for long.
 

cm581978

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Posts
3,294
Reaction score
2
Location
NJ
Definately impressive the rods took that abuse. But I agree with everyone else, take it easy, because the motor is probably on borrowed time
 

Jaylee

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Posts
135
Reaction score
0
Location
Dirty South
Do you have any pics of the intercooler with the maf mount in it? I read about it somewhere else but havent seen any pics of it.
 

Marc s

NASA AIX
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Posts
3,867
Reaction score
29
Location
Auburn, WA
60lb injectors, twin GT500 pumps, Mafia.

Everyone that knows me on this site knows I don't spew BS. I also know it won't live long. That's why I plan on short shifting it. If it blows up, oh well.

070110dyno.jpg
 

Alter Ego Trip

Pot Stirring Aficianado
Joined
May 9, 2010
Posts
1,733
Reaction score
26
Location
White room with padded walls
Ah, the puzzle's coming together. I was skeptic, to say the least, with a stock fuel system. That AFR still makes me nervous though. At that much power it doesn't take much going wrong to grenade a motor.

Can't wait to see what that's capable of on a built motor.
 

Marc s

NASA AIX
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Posts
3,867
Reaction score
29
Location
Auburn, WA
I'm going to have to call BS. 586 hp on a Mustang dyno is equivalent to about 650 on a Dynojet (figured conservatively). I just don't see it making that, or the rods holding together at that amount of power. Especially as I don't see any serious fuel upgrades in your sig.

The Mustang dyno I use is very close to Dynojet numbers. As a comparison, when my car made 326 on a Mustang dyno, it made 339 the same day on my friends Dynojet.

I agree with you, I don't see it holding together either.
 
Back
Top