WE SHOULDN'T TALK ABOUT NOTHING BUT THE RPM ACT!!!!!

Shaffe

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Posts
8,299
Reaction score
532
Location
Carol Stream, IL
Nobody is saying you can not mod your car. They are saying you can not disable/remove the emissions control devices and functions. That is all. If you have to do that to mod your car, you should rethink what you're doing. You can still improve performance without disabling/removing the emissions control devices and functions.

Just think about it. If they are only doing an emissions systems readiness test (like Upstate/Western NYS), you can do anything including making it run dirty as long as the system is ready and no faults are lit up. The control systems just need to be present and functioning without fault codes. Everything else does not matter.

And the EPA is already regulating wood stove emissions.

Right but the problem is the EPA has no grey area. On the most technical term if they follow the law to a T, if you alter the tune, that's altering the way the car was factory certified as emissions compliant. That could technically be seen as illegal.

Hell I think it was you that mentioned the 05-09 had emissions equipment that had to be moved to put a CAI, under the EPA guidelines that would be illegal
 

tjm73

of Omicron Persei 8
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Posts
12,092
Reaction score
1,641
Location
Rush, NY
Unless that tune has an EO#, yes. And yes I mention the '05 I had that had the emissions control device in the CAI.
 

luillo

Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
1,581
Reaction score
44
Location
Fort Walton Beach, Florida
Nobody is saying you can not mod your car. They are saying you can not disable/remove the emissions control devices and functions. That is all. If you have to do that to mod your car, you should rethink what you're doing. You can still improve performance without disabling/removing the emissions control devices and functions.

Just think about it. If they are only doing an emissions systems readiness test (like Upstate/Western NYS), you can do anything including making it run dirty as long as the system is ready and no faults are lit up. The control systems just need to be present and functioning without fault codes. Everything else does not matter.

And the EPA is already regulating wood stove emissions.

You might want to refresh on the information that has been developing about the industry. It is exactly what is been proposed if you dig in the information and legislation proposed.

If you touch just about anything is not allowed. Anything changed on the stock configuration from factory. Specially if it needs any type of software configuration i.e. tune, is illegal.

So what do you really think is going to happen when companies will lot be able to sell just about anything?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

luillo

Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
1,581
Reaction score
44
Location
Fort Walton Beach, Florida
Let’s put it in perspective.

High flow cats> no
CAI> no unless no tune=why bother
Catch can>no
High performance heads>no
Cams>no

And the list goes on. If we think that the aftermarket world will go and spend that kind of money let’s just get used to them been gone unless is a large corporation with large capital to fund that development and connects to have the certification.

Mean while Fu%*#K all the companies that have been supporting us this whole time.

Let me list a few to refresh memories:

Lund Racing
VMP
TPS
JDM
L&M
JPC

They might be able to survive but maybe no.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

RED09GT

Equal Opportunity Offender
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
2,631
Reaction score
494
Location
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
The bottom line is that this hobby will get out of financial reach for more and more people.

I don't want it to get to the point that we will only be able to chose from the same 6 legal parts as everyone else and all be capable of running the exact same times as everyone else. This is equally as lame as saying you can lift weights but you are limited to lifting the same weight and the same number of reps as the weakest noodle in the gym.

This is just another tactic in the war on the private automobile.
 

Juice

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2017
Posts
5,024
Reaction score
2,149
Let’s put it in perspective.

High flow cats> no
CAI> no unless no tune=why bother
Catch can>no
High performance heads>no
Cams>no

And the list goes on. If we think that the aftermarket world will go and spend that kind of money let’s just get used to them been gone unless is a large corporation with large capital to fund that development and connects to have the certification.

Mean while Fu%*#K all the companies that have been supporting us this whole time.

Let me list a few to refresh memories:

Lund Racing
VMP
TPS
JDM
L&M
JPC

They might be able to survive but maybe no.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CARB legal parts must be used. Like cams.
Tuning is sometimes required to stay compliant. Say you swapped to a magnum xl trans and now your gear ratios dont match the tune. Since the gear ratio is wrong, so is the calculated engine load and the pcm is no longer operating as designed.
 

RED09GT

Equal Opportunity Offender
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
2,631
Reaction score
494
Location
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
CARB legal parts must be used. Like cams.
Tuning is sometimes required to stay compliant. Say you swapped to a magnum xl trans and now your gear ratios dont match the tune. Since the gear ratio is wrong, so is the calculated engine load and the pcm is no longer operating as designed.
And if there is no approved tune for that configuration, then what?
 

tjm73

of Omicron Persei 8
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Posts
12,092
Reaction score
1,641
Location
Rush, NY
And if there is no approved tune for that configuration, then what?

If you ran it you would be technically out of compliance. However...the EPA has no way to check it. States do inspections and they don't check for such things. All the EPA can do is raid the company that sold the tune and get a list of who bought it. Then they would have to get search warrants to get access to each individuals car to scan it to see if you were in compliance. Then they could fine you and make you run a compliant tune. But multiply that effort by thousands and thousands of tuned cars scattered across the country. The logistics and cost to perform enforcement would be staggering. It's just not practical to go after the owner. So they just go for the low hanging fruit, the manufacturer.

The enforcement actions scare a whole lot of manufacturers into compliance and they make examples of a few. They get mostly what they want and move on to something else that's hotter. They are a Gov't agency with budgetary limitations. They are not funded like the FBI or the military.
 
Last edited:

Pentalab

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2013
Posts
5,500
Reaction score
1,312
And the EPA is already regulating wood stove emissions.[/QUOTE said:
Say what ? How is that working out ? My natural gas fireplace is a 100 times cleaner than any wood stove made..period..... but I get fucked over paying carbon tax on the natural gas.
 

tjm73

of Omicron Persei 8
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Posts
12,092
Reaction score
1,641
Location
Rush, NY
Say what ? How is that working out ? My natural gas fireplace is a 100 times cleaner than any wood stove made..period..... but I get fucked over paying carbon tax on the natural gas.

New wood stoves have to EPA certified. To be so they have to meet a specific regulation which establishes some limits such as particulate for example. I was reading about this just the other day.

https://www.epa.gov/burnwise/epa-certified-wood-stoves
 

06 T-RED S/C GT

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Posts
2,270
Reaction score
370
Location
Carnegie, PA
I would definitely love have powerful cars within reasonable compliance. I think road driven cars allowed to use approve performance parts is reasonable but competitions cars shouldn’t be in the conversations at all.

I would love to daily drive my compliant car with bolt ons and swap all out parts for the track.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

IMHO! The EPA is more concerned with street driven vehicles not being in compliance, especially when it comes to removing any portion of the "OEM" emission control devices which technically has always been illegal from the very start, to begin with anyhow. As for vehicles used strictly for competition use only! Yes, I totally agree they shouldn't be a factor at all, being as they're in a controlled, off-road environment.

The Livernois video tells me they are positioning themselves to "play by the rules". That's how they see themselves surviving and making profit where they can.

There are fights you can win and fights you can't.

When a car is removed from street use completely, I am against the EPA actions. If it is still used on the streets, you gotta stay compliant.

Yes, when a car is removed from street use completely, I totally agree against the EPA actions, but in favor if still used on the streets, no doubt about it!

This is getting beyond stupid. Whether it has oem cats..or hi-flow cats, who cares ? LT's are more efficient than oem exhaust manifold, again who cares.

If you have a blower on the car, how often is it actually used on the street...a few seconds here and there. I can feather the gas pedal, so it's not quite into boost..and it pulls like a mofo on the hwy. 30-50 mph on the hwy comes damned fast, so does 0-100 mph...or 50-75 mph. With the blower on, it comes up a lot faster. The hi flow cats are doing their job.

As far as I can see, they are making a big issue about .... nothing. It will cost a fortune to enact compliance..and for what ? A non issue to begin with.

'They' would be better off to slap a carbon tax on folks with their wood burning stoves and fireplaces.

How exactly are LT's more efficient than OEM if they're unable to pass OBDII emissions testing? Same also applies to high-flow cats as well, unless they're Kooks high-flow green cats in which they don't always pass OBDII emissions testing either!

He was been sarcastic not literally using stove on cars.

The point is that we other support the movement or sell our hobbies. How about that?

EPA doesn’t really care about clean air or they would of done real homework to be fair all across.

It is al politics and the only way tot fight is with representation starting with us and these forums not bowing down.

Yes, with this bunch of mentality that we should quit we might losses our right to mod our cars for sport!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well there's a gray line between modifying cars strictly for competition and for the street. As mentioned earlier in this thread, I totally disagree with the EPA on vehicles used for off-road/competition use only, but do agree that street driven vehicles should be in compliance with the EPA.

Nobody is saying you can not mod your car. They are saying you can not disable/remove the emissions control devices and functions. That is all. If you have to do that to mod your car, you should rethink what you're doing. You can still improve performance without disabling/removing the emissions control devices and functions.

Just think about it. If they are only doing an emissions systems readiness test (like Upstate/Western NYS), you can do anything including making it run dirty as long as the system is ready and no faults are lit up. The control systems just need to be present and functioning without fault codes. Everything else does not matter.

^^^^ This I agree 100%


That’s what is currently proposed or in act. The bad thing about that is EPA going after manufactures to stop the developing of parts to ensure that prices happens. It don’t matter it you have the control items in the car.

There is many ways to go about it. I germany they are very strict but as long as you pass emissions and have no lights and have catalytic you good. Not legally but they don’t know and don’t care.

Or we can actually be clean and still been able to mod. High performance pets legal. Some sort of CARB E.O. Concept but for everybody and not so strict.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Once again, the EPA is only concerned when it comes to removing any portion of the "OEM" emission control system which technically has always been against federal law, to begin with. Therefore, nobody is saying that you cannot modify your car. If adding performance cams, heads, CAIs and superchargers? as long as they pass visual and emissions testing, then no problem. What do you think cars such as the 2020 Shelby GT500 and Dodge Challenger "Hellcat and Demon" come factory equipped with? they all include factory performance heads, cams, CAI's and blowers which have no problem in being 100% street legal and in compliance with the EPA.

Right but the problem is the EPA has no grey area. On the most technical term if they follow the law to a T, if you alter the tune, that's altering the way the car was factory certified as emissions compliant. That could technically be seen as illegal.

Hell I think it was you that mentioned the 05-09 had emissions equipment that had to be moved to put a CAI, under the EPA guidelines that would be illegal

That is total nonsense! As long as you're not altering/removing any portion of the factory emission control devices and the vehicle passes the OBDII emissions test? a performance calibration tune has nothing to do with it, unless it somehow disables the emission/02 monitors in which case wouldn't pass OBDII emissions testing, to begin with anyhow.

You might want to refresh on the information that has been developing about the industry. It is exactly what is been proposed if you dig in the information and legislation proposed.

If you touch just about anything is not allowed. Anything changed on the stock configuration from factory. Specially if it needs any type of software configuration i.e. tune, is illegal.

So what do you really think is going to happen when companies will lot be able to sell just about anything?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Once again, complete nonsense! As long as you're not altering/removing any portion of the factory emission control devices and the vehicle passes the OBDII emissions test? a performance calibration tune has nothing to do with it, unless it somehow disables the emission/02 monitors in which case wouldn't pass OBDII emissions testing, to begin with anyhow.

Let’s put it in perspective.

High flow cats> no
CAI> no unless no tune=why bother
Catch can>no
High performance heads>no
Cams>no

And the list goes on. If we think that the aftermarket world will go and spend that kind of money let’s just get used to them been gone unless is a large corporation with large capital to fund that development and connects to have the certification.

Mean while Fu%*#K all the companies that have been supporting us this whole time.

Let me list a few to refresh memories:

Lund Racing
VMP
TPS
JDM
L&M
JPC

They might be able to survive but maybe no.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So let's indeed put it in perspective.

Once again, the EPA is only concerned when it comes to removing any portion of the "OEM" emission control system which technically has always been against federal law, to begin with. Therefore, nobody is saying that you cannot modify your car. If adding performance cams, heads CAIs and superchargers? as long as they pass visual and emissions testing, then no problem. What do you think cars such as the 2020 Shelby GT500 and Dodge Challenger "Hellcat and Demon" come factory equipped with? they all include factory performance heads, cams, CAI's and blowers which have no problem in being 100% street legal and in compliance with the EPA.

Wrong. If you live in a rural area without public transportation, you need a car.

I do agree that if you live in a rural area without public transportation, it is indeed a necessity to have a car, however, you can survive without owning or having one, such as relying on friends/family members or neighbors that do own cars.
 
Last edited:

JEWC_Motorsports

S197 Junkie
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
20,594
Reaction score
1,713
Location
Texas
^ this guy wants to argue with everyone. The EPA doesn't want any tuning device to be used on any street legal auto. You cant go and buy SCT tuning software unless you agree to use it on offroad vehicles only. That is new this year. At least KNOW what you are talking about before you disagree with everyone.
 

Juice

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2017
Posts
5,024
Reaction score
2,149
^ this guy wants to argue with everyone. The EPA doesn't want any tuning device to be used on any street legal auto. You cant go and buy SCT tuning software unless you agree to use it on offroad vehicles only. That is new this year. At least KNOW what you are talking about before you disagree with everyone.
BS You take a small course and must pass it, and then you sign the EULA that you will NOT use it to disable emission funtions on street driven vehicle. And I have full access to the tune. This was after the sct lawsuit was settled. SCT provides the tool, the use of it is now the responsibility of the end user.
 

06 T-RED S/C GT

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Posts
2,270
Reaction score
370
Location
Carnegie, PA
^ this guy wants to argue with everyone. The EPA doesn't want any tuning device to be used on any street legal auto. You cant go and buy SCT tuning software unless you agree to use it on offroad vehicles only. That is new this year. At least KNOW what you are talking about before you disagree with everyone.

If you're referring to my posts? Just exactly how do you come to the conclusion I want to argue with everyone when in fact, I actually agree with what's been posted regarding the EPA requirements when it comes to street driven vehicles. If what you claim about the EPA stating that tuning devices are not legal on street driven vehicles? then back it up with some actual documentation before you go calling out another forum member of not knowing what their talking about and since when do you speak for everyone on this forum!

BS You take a small course and must pass it, and then you sign the EULA that you will NOT use it to disable emission funtions on street driven vehicle. And I have full access to the tune. This was after the sct lawsuit was settled. SCT provides the tool, the use of it is now the responsibility of the end user.

Exactly 100% spot on.
 
Last edited:

luillo

Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
1,581
Reaction score
44
Location
Fort Walton Beach, Florida
Good video to gain some inside of has happened in the past.
For those you you just talking about CARB E.O. Pay attention to 7:30 on the video.



All of you arguing the issue the EPA DOESN’T HAVE YOUR BACK, THE HOBBY INTEREST or for the matter any flying care about clean air or they would of get smart about all issues involved. Let’s be clear about it. I am a firm believer there is an agenda to profit from, no other answer.

If they care about clean air we would of have tons more options for mods and still comply EASY!!! E85/high flow cats. No doubt will make a powerful animal well below any emissions standards but they CAN’T even set a standard because maybe they don’t even know it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JEWC_Motorsports

S197 Junkie
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
20,594
Reaction score
1,713
Location
Texas
There are a ton of videos......and info released by SCT all over the net. Several tuners have cut ties with SCT, get off the forum and do some research.
 

luillo

Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
1,581
Reaction score
44
Location
Fort Walton Beach, Florida
There are a ton of videos......and info released by SCT all over the net. Several tuners have cut ties with SCT, get off the forum and do some research.

Obviously Sherlock!! This videos are from 2015. I’m just sharing to make sure the comments are relevant. Al I see is defending the EPA injustice lately.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top